The association and clinicopathological significance of Integrin alphavbeta6 and Rac1 expression in gastric carcinoma.

Background: The present study investigate the expression and correlation of ITGB6 and Rac1 proteins in gastric cancer tissues. By exploring the clinical significance and functions of these proteins, we aimed to gain further insights into the mechanisms underlying gastric cancer development. Patients and methods: In this study, a total of 198 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent gastrectomy between July 2010 to October 2012 were included. The median follow-up time was 52.00 months. To evaluate the factors influencing overall survival, Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were conducted. Furthermore, an independent prognostic factor-based nomogram was constructed and validated to predict survival outcomes in gastric cancer patients. In addition, in vitro experiments including CCK8 and Transwell assays were conducted to explore the roles of ITGB6 and Rac1 in gastric cancer. Results: The expression levels of ITGB6 and Rac1 in gastric cancerous and paraneoplastic tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. The correlation and clinical significance of the two proteins were also investigated. ITGB6 expression showed significant associations with tumor size (P=0.030), pathological grading (P=0.013), location (P=0.031), N stage (P=0.002), and clinical stage (P=0.002). Additionally, we found that tumor size (P=0.013), tumor's anatomical location (P=0.031), N stage (P=0.002), clinical stage (P=0.035), and survival status (P<0.001) were significantly associated with the expression of Rac1. ITGB6 was moderately correlated with Rac1 (r=0.285, P<0.001). Both the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model analysis demonstrated that the presence of positive expression of ITGB6 and Rac1 proteins served as independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer. These findings highlight the potential of ITGB6 and Rac1 as valuable markers for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (HR=2.212 P<0.001 and HR=2.073 P=0.001), with a significant poorer trend for 5-year survival (P<0.0001, respectively, the log-rank test). Additionally, subsequent in vitro experiments preliminarily demonstrated that ITGB6 and Rac1 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells, and ITGB6 may functions via targeting Rac1. Conclusion: ITGB6 and Rac1 are indicators of poor prognosis and tumor progression in gastric cancer patients. The potential signaling pathways associated with both may provide useful targets for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic or robotic radical gastrectomy based on preoperative perigastric artery CTA surgical decision-making: a high-volume center retrospective study with propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have demonstrated the short-term recovery course for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy according to preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment. However, reports of the long-term oncological outcomes are still limited. METHODS: The data of 988 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic radical gastrectomy between January 2014 and September 2018 were analyzed retrospectively at our center, and propensity score matching was used to eliminate bias. Study cohorts were divided into the CTA group (n = 498) and the non-CTA group (n = 490) depending on whether preoperative CTA was available. The primary and secondary endpoints were the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates and the intraoperative course and short-term outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: 431 patients were included in each group after PSM. Compared with the non-CTA group, the CTA group had more harvested lymph nodes and less operative time, blood loss, intraoperative vascular injury and total cost, especially in the subgroup analysis with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 patients. There was no difference in the 3 year OS and DFS between the CTA group and the non-CTA group. When further stratified by BMI < 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2, the 3-year OS and DFS were significantly higher in the CTA group than in the non-CTA group in terms of BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic or robotic radical gastrectomy based on preoperative perigastric artery CTA surgical decision-making has the possibility of improving short-term outcomes. However, there is no difference in the long-term prognosis, except for a subgroup of patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy for LAGC (cT2-4aN+M0) after NACT from January 2015 to December 2019. The patients were divided into a LG group and an open gastrectomy (OG) group. The short- and long-term outcomes in both groups were examined following propensity score matching. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed 288 patients with LAGC who underwent gastrectomy following NACT. Of these 288 patients, 218 were enrolled; after 1:1 propensity score matching, each group comprised 81 patients. The LG group had significantly lower estimated blood loss than the OG group [80 (50-110) vs. 280 (210-320) mL, P < 0.001) but a longer operation time [205 (186.5-222.5) vs. 182 (170-190) min, P < 0.001], a lower postoperative complication rate (24.7% vs. 42.0%, P = 0.002), and a shorter postoperative hospitalization period [8 (7-10) vs. 10 (8-11.5) days, P = 0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy had a lower rate of postoperative complications than patients in the OG group (18.8% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.034); however, such a pattern was not seen in patients who underwent total gastrectomy (32.3% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.251). The 3-year matched cohort analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = 0.816 and P = 0.726, respectively) (71.3% and 65.0% in OG vs. 69.1% and 61.7% in LG, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the short term, LG following NACT is safer and more effective than OG. However, the long-term results are comparable.

Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high-volume center retrospective propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three-year overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short-term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long-term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner.